THE NOMINAL DEFENDANT v WARDLE [1998] NSWCA 229
The application is refused because no appellable error has been established in the exercise of discretion by Simpson J.
- Parties
- Applicant: The Nominal Defendant; Respondent: Wardle
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 February 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Application for Leave
- Outcome
- summons dismissed with costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
The Nominal Defendant
Applicant
Wardle
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application for Leave
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judgment of Simpson J contains appellable error in the exercise of discretion
Ratio Decidendi
The application is refused because no appellable error has been established in the exercise of discretion by Simpson J.
Court Disposition
summons dismissed with costs
Orders
- The summons is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment