The Owners - Strata Plan 82089 v Omaya Holdings Pty Ltd (No 4) [2025] NSWSC 111
Costs are determined for each discrete issue. The plaintiff (Owners Corporation) is to pay the first and second defendants' costs on the effective height claim, and to pay third and sixth defendants' costs generally, with indemnity costs from date of offer of compromise. Conversely, the first and second defendants are to pay the plaintiff's costs relating to the uncontested fire safety defects claim.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: The Owners - Strata Plan 82089; First Defendant: Omaya Holdings Pty Ltd; Second Defendant: Arinson Pty Limited; Third Defendant: Omaya Investments Pty Ltd; Sixth Defendant: BSM Holdings Pty Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 February 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Technology and Construction List / Costs Determination Following Substantive Judgment
- Outcome
- Costs orders granted as specified for each issue and party; requests for further submissions to finalize minutes of order.
- Legal Topics
- Party/party Costs, Indemnity Costs, Offer of Compromise, Multiple Discrete Issues
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Owners - Strata Plan 82089
Plaintiff
Omaya Holdings Pty Ltd
First Defendant
Arinson Pty Limited
Second Defendant
Omaya Investments Pty Ltd
Third Defendant
BSM Holdings Pty Limited
Sixth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Equity Technology and Construction List / Costs Determination Following Substantive Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether costs should follow the event for each discrete issue
- 2 Whether to defer costs determination pending referee's report
- 3 Application of indemnity costs after offer of compromise for certain defendants
Ratio Decidendi
Costs are determined for each discrete issue. The plaintiff (Owners Corporation) is to pay the first and second defendants' costs on the effective height claim, and to pay third and sixth defendants' costs generally, with indemnity costs from date of offer of compromise. Conversely, the first and second defendants are to pay the plaintiff's costs relating to the uncontested fire safety defects claim.
Court Disposition
Costs orders granted as specified for each issue and party; requests for further submissions to finalize minutes of order.
Orders
- Plaintiff to pay first and second defendants' costs of the plaintiff's fire defects effective height claim
- Plaintiff to pay third and sixth defendants' costs generally
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment