The Owners-Strata Plan 934 v T&P Chimes Development Pty Ltd [2025] NSWLEC 9
The Court found that the definition of Option Agreement in the strata renewal plan was sufficiently broad to include contracts for sale, and therefore no variation of clause 3.3(g) was needed to reflect higher sale prices from those contracts. The Court also found that varying Annexure B to increase the proposed sale price for lot 19 constituted a variation of a minor nature that does not affect the plan in any substantial way. Therefore, the applicant was to proceed to seek written agreement to the variation from all supporting owners before final orders are made. The variation to the lot 19 sale price to match the lot 18 sale price was found to be just and equitable in all the...
- Parties
- Applicant: The Owners-Strata Plan 934; First Respondent: T&P Chimes Development Pty Ltd; Second Respondent: Cubile Pty Ltd (ACN 110062630); Third Respondent: Diana Dolores Mullins; Fourth Respondent: John Rogers; Fifth Respondent: Graeme Noel Curry; Sixth Respondent: Lydia Katey Dimarco; Seventh Respondent: Alfio Gerard Dimarco; Eighth Respondent: Lawrence Michael Lutteral; Ninth Respondent: Robert Villamaria; Tenth Respondent: Christina Villamaria; Eleventh Respondent: Philip Sean Jirman; Twelfth Respondent: Anthony David Godfrey Corp; Thirteenth Respondent: Judith Margaret Corp; Fourteenth Respondent: FBIR Holdings Pty Ltd ACN 137 488 601; Fifteenth Respondent: Maryanne Dajkovich; Sixteenth Respondent: Michael James Reed; Seventeenth Respondent: EB 9&10 Pty Ltd (ACN 140 310 729); Eighteenth Respondent: Barbara Lynn Schmidt; Nineteenth Respondent: Peter William Cudlipp; Twentieth Respondent: Kathleen Anne Hackett; Twenty First Respondent: R C Minter Superannuation Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 February 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Class 3 Application – Strata Renewal Plan (preliminary Orders) / Preliminary Determination – Variation of Strata Renewal Plan Prior to Final Orders
- Outcome
- Preliminary orders made varying sale price for lot 19, requiring written agreement to variation from supporting owners. Matter to return for final orders after procedural compliance.
- Legal Topics
- Strata Schemes – Renewal and Redevelopment, Strata Schemes Development Act 2015 (nsw) – Variation of Plan, Compensation and Settlement Terms for Dissenting Owners, Court Powers to Vary Strata Renewal Plan, Support Notice Procedures, Procedural Fairness in Strata Renewal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Owners-Strata Plan 934
Applicant
T&P Chimes Development Pty Ltd
First Respondent
Cubile Pty Ltd (ACN 110062630)
Second Respondent
Diana Dolores Mullins
Third Respondent
John Rogers
Fourth Respondent
Graeme Noel Curry
Fifth Respondent
Lydia Katey Dimarco
Sixth Respondent
Alfio Gerard Dimarco
Seventh Respondent
Lawrence Michael Lutteral
Eighth Respondent
Robert Villamaria
Ninth Respondent
Christina Villamaria
Tenth Respondent
Philip Sean Jirman
Eleventh Respondent
Anthony David Godfrey Corp
Twelfth Respondent
Judith Margaret Corp
Thirteenth Respondent
FBIR Holdings Pty Ltd ACN 137 488 601
Fourteenth Respondent
Maryanne Dajkovich
Fifteenth Respondent
Michael James Reed
Sixteenth Respondent
EB 9&10 Pty Ltd (ACN 140 310 729)
Seventeenth Respondent
Barbara Lynn Schmidt
Eighteenth Respondent
Peter William Cudlipp
Nineteenth Respondent
Kathleen Anne Hackett
Twentieth Respondent
R C Minter Superannuation Pty Ltd
Twenty First Respondent
Procedural Posture
Class 3 Application – Strata Renewal Plan (preliminary Orders) / Preliminary Determination – Variation of Strata Renewal Plan Prior to Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether clause 3.3(g) of the strata renewal plan needs to be varied to reflect higher sale prices in contracts for sale
- 2 Whether the Court should vary Annexure B to the strata renewal plan regarding the proposed sale price of lot 19
- 3 Whether the proposed variations are of a minor nature that do not affect the plan in any substantial way under s 182(3)(a) Strata Schemes Development Act 2015 (NSW)
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the definition of Option Agreement in the strata renewal plan was sufficiently broad to include contracts for sale, and therefore no variation of clause 3.3(g) was needed to reflect higher sale prices from those contracts. The Court also found that varying Annexure B to increase the proposed sale price for lot 19 constituted a variation of a minor nature that does not affect the plan in any substantial way. Therefore, the applicant was to proceed to seek written agreement to the variation from all supporting owners before final orders are made. The variation to the lot 19 sale price to match the lot 18 sale price was found to be just and equitable in all the...
Court Disposition
Preliminary orders made varying sale price for lot 19, requiring written agreement to variation from supporting owners. Matter to return for final orders after procedural compliance.
Orders
- The applicant is to seek from the owners of each lot in relation to which a support notice has been given, within the meaning of s 174(1) Strata Schemes Development Act 2015 (NSW), written agreement to a variation to Annexure B to the strata renewal plan in relation to lot 19 to increase the purchase price for lot...
- The applicant is to seek from the owners of each lot in relation to which a support notice has been given written agreement to the variation to the strata renewal plan within 28 days of these orders.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment