The Owners – Strata Plan 94255 v Luu [2022] NSWLEC 1265
Both trees are likely to cause future damage or injury. Orders for removal are appropriate. The Respondents are to bear the cost as is usual; the Applicant's development did not create the risk and, regardless, risk to property or persons would have justified removal orders.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 May 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Tree Dispute Application / Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- ['damage to Property by Trees' 'risk of Injury by Trees' 'removal of Trees' 'responsibility for Cost of Tree Removal']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Tree Dispute Application / Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the trees have caused or are likely to cause damage or injury' 'Who should bear the cost of removing the trees']
Ratio Decidendi
Both trees are likely to cause future damage or injury. Orders for removal are appropriate. The Respondents are to bear the cost as is usual; the Applicant's development did not create the risk and, regardless, risk to property or persons would have justified removal orders.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- ['The application is granted.' "Respondents to engage and pay for a suitably qualified arborist (minimum AQF level 3) with all appropriate insurances to remove both trees T1 and T2 to no more than one metre above ground level within 60 days of the date of these orders. Tree removal to be done in accordance with the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment