Read v The Owners-Strata Plan No 2533 [2021] NSWCATAP 218
The Tribunal did not err in its interpretation or application of s 24 of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW). The Tribunal found breaches regarding proper notice and chairing the meeting, but determined these did not adversely affect any person nor alter the passing of resolutions. All requirements for refusing to invalidate the resolutions under s 24(3) were met. Leave to appeal was refused and the appeal dismissed.
- Parties
- First Appellant: Marlene Noella Read; Second Appellant: Mavis Patricia Read; Respondent: The Owners-Strata Plan No 2533
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 July 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Determination of Application for Leave to Appeal and Substantive Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Strata Title, Owners Corporation Meetings, Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (nsw), Application to Invalidate Resolutions at General Meeting
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Marlene Noella Read
First Appellant
Mavis Patricia Read
Second Appellant
The Owners-Strata Plan No 2533
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Determination of Application for Leave to Appeal and Substantive Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal erred in its interpretation and application of s 24 of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW) in refusing to invalidate resolutions of the AGM
- 2 Whether the Tribunal failed to consider all alleged breaches of the Act or apply required tests under s 24(3)
- 3 Whether procedural fairness was afforded to the appellants
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal did not err in its interpretation or application of s 24 of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW). The Tribunal found breaches regarding proper notice and chairing the meeting, but determined these did not adversely affect any person nor alter the passing of resolutions. All requirements for refusing to invalidate the resolutions under s 24(3) were met. Leave to appeal was refused and the appeal dismissed.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Leave to appeal refused
- Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment