The Owners – Strata Plan No 2661 v Selkirk [2024] NSWSC 760
It is open to an owners corporation to establish that all or part of a lot owner's claimed damages are not damages for foreseeable losses as a result of the owners corporation's breach of duty, including by establishing that the lot owner has behaved unreasonably in failing to mitigate loss; the Appeal Panel erred in law to the extent it held otherwise by treating the statutory power under s 122 as a complete answer to mitigation.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 June 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Decision on Application for Leave to Appeal and Substantive Appeal
- Outcome
- Grant leave to appeal (confined to mitigation defence); appeal allowed; mitigation defence is available; remittal as per reasons; referral to Office of the Legal Services Commissioner.
- Legal Topics
- ['strata Title' 'owners Corporation Duties' 'duty to Repair and Maintain Common Property' 'claims Under Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (nsw)' 'mitigation of Loss' 'statutory Damages' 'causation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Decision on Application for Leave to Appeal and Substantive Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a mitigation defence is available in answer or partial answer to a claim for damages under s 106(5) of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW)' "Whether the lot owner's conduct bars or reduces recovery of damages" 'Whether the Appeal Panel erred in law by excluding mitigation as a consideration under s 106(5)' 'Proper application of statutory causation and mitigation in strata claims']
Ratio Decidendi
It is open to an owners corporation to establish that all or part of a lot owner's claimed damages are not damages for foreseeable losses as a result of the owners corporation's breach of duty, including by establishing that the lot owner has behaved unreasonably in failing to mitigate loss; the Appeal Panel erred in law to the extent it held otherwise by treating the statutory power under s 122 as a complete answer to mitigation.
Court Disposition
Grant leave to appeal (confined to mitigation defence); appeal allowed; mitigation defence is available; remittal as per reasons; referral to Office of the Legal Services Commissioner.
Orders
- ['Grant leave to appeal, confined to ground 3 of the summons filed on 5 March 2024, and otherwise refuse leave.' 'Appeal allowed.' "Answer the question 'Whether a mitigation defence is available in answer or partial answer to a claim for damages under s 106(5)': It is open to an owners corporation to seek to...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment