The Owners Strata Plan No 38308 v Gelder [2023] NSWCATEN 5
The Tribunal refused leave for Mr Atkin to represent the Owners because as the sole material witness with contested evidence, his dual role posed unacceptable conflict of interest, contravened Rule 27, and granting leave would not be in the interests of justice or parties.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 June 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Referral Application for Contempt and Procedural Orders / Interlocutory Determination of Representation
- Outcome
- Leave to be represented by Mr Atkin refused; matter to be listed for further directions.
- Legal Topics
- ['representation' 'conflict of Interest' 'solicitor as Witness' 'leave to Appear' 'tribunal Procedure']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Referral Application for Contempt and Procedural Orders / Interlocutory Determination of Representation
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave should be granted for applicant to be represented by solicitor who is a material witness in the proceedings']
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal refused leave for Mr Atkin to represent the Owners because as the sole material witness with contested evidence, his dual role posed unacceptable conflict of interest, contravened Rule 27, and granting leave would not be in the interests of justice or parties.
Court Disposition
Leave to be represented by Mr Atkin refused; matter to be listed for further directions.
Orders
- ['The Tribunal refuses leave for the Applicant to be represented by Mr Atkin.' 'The proceedings are to be listed for further directions on a date to be fixed by the Registrar after 1 August 2023.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment