The Owners - Strata Plan No 4393 v Roberts [2023] NSWCATCD 57
Section 247A of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW) does not permit multiple penalties for repeated breaches of a single prohibitive order. Proof of contravention does not require intent, but only proof of breach of the order. If there are separate orders imposing discrete obligations, penalties may be imposed for contravention of each such order.
- Parties
- Applicant: The Owners - Strata Plan No 4393; First Respondent: Mei Lan Roberts; Second Respondent/intervenor: The Commissioner for Fair Trading of the Department of Customer Service
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 July 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Civil Penalty Under S 247 a Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (nsw) / Interlocutory Decision on Contravention and Statutory Construction Issues
- Outcome
- Further hearing listed; contraventions established in part; penalty determination adjourned for submissions.
- Legal Topics
- Strata Title, Civil Penalty, Contravention of Tribunal Order, Statutory Interpretation of Penalty Provisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Owners - Strata Plan No 4393
Applicant
Mei Lan Roberts
First Respondent
The Commissioner for Fair Trading of the Department of Customer Service
Second Respondent/intervenor
Procedural Posture
Application for Civil Penalty Under S 247 a Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (nsw) / Interlocutory Decision on Contravention and Statutory Construction Issues
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there have been multiple contraventions of orders of the Tribunal
- 2 Whether the Tribunal can impose multiple penalties for successive contraventions of a single order
- 3 Whether intent (mens rea) is required for contravention under s 247A Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW)
Ratio Decidendi
Section 247A of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW) does not permit multiple penalties for repeated breaches of a single prohibitive order. Proof of contravention does not require intent, but only proof of breach of the order. If there are separate orders imposing discrete obligations, penalties may be imposed for contravention of each such order.
Court Disposition
Further hearing listed; contraventions established in part; penalty determination adjourned for submissions.
Orders
- On a date to be fixed by the Registrar, the proceedings are to be listed for hearing of Outstanding Issues (contraventions requiring further submissions, penalty quantum, and costs).
- Applicant to file and serve submissions by 7 August 2023.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment