The Owners - Strata Plan No 60182 v Bornzin [2019] NSWCATCD 30
Because the orders made on 27 April 2016 by Senior Member Rosser under the Strata Schemes Management Act 1996 (NSW) lapsed after two years by operation of s 172 of that Act, and no new or independent basis for access and work orders was clearly articulated or adjudicated upon in these proceedings, the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to make the orders sought by the owners corporation. The application was therefore dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 March 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Strata Dispute / Civil and Administrative Tribunal Application / Final Decision on Application (after Hearing and Submissions)
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['orders Under Strata Schemes Management Act' 'operation of Savings and Transitional Provisions' 'access and Work Orders' 'compliance With Previous Tribunal Orders' 'jurisdiction and Duration of Orders' 'procedural Fairness']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Strata Dispute / Civil and Administrative Tribunal Application / Final Decision on Application (after Hearing and Submissions)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the owners corporation was entitled to access orders under the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW) to remove unauthorised installations from a Lot based on expired prior Tribunal orders' 'Whether the prior orders made under the Strata Schemes Management Act 1996 (NSW) remained in force at the relevant time due to transitional provisions' 'Whether the Tribunal could make appropriate orders nunc pro tunc or anew based on the circumstances' 'Whether procedural fairness was afforded to the Lot owner regarding new bases for the orders sought']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the orders made on 27 April 2016 by Senior Member Rosser under the Strata Schemes Management Act 1996 (NSW) lapsed after two years by operation of s 172 of that Act, and no new or independent basis for access and work orders was clearly articulated or adjudicated upon in these proceedings, the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to make the orders sought by the owners corporation. The application was therefore dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ['Application dismissed.' 'Any costs application by the respondent to be made in writing with supporting submissions not exceeding 5 pages, with copy to the other party, within 14 days of the decision.' 'If any costs application is made, the applicant may file and serve submissions in reply (not exceeding 5 pages)...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment