Owners Strata Plan 61172 v Stratabuild Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] NSWSC 1568
The adjudication process under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 does not constitute the exercise of the powers of a 'court' as required by s 6 of the Suitors' Fund Act 1951. The adjudicator is not appointed in a manner considered appropriate for a 'court', does not have judicial powers or procedures, there is no obligation under the Act for legal qualifications, and the process lacks elements such as public hearing and power to compel or enforce. Accordingly, an adjudicator's determination is not a 'decision of a court', and so the application for an indemnity certificate is dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Indemnity Certificate / Post Judgment/costs Application
- Outcome
- Application for indemnity certificate dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['indemnity Certificates' "suitors' Fund Act" "whether an Adjudicator Is a 'court'" 'building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Indemnity Certificate / Post Judgment/costs Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether a Supreme Court review of an adjudicator's decision is an 'appeal' for the purposes of the Suitors' Fund Act 1951" "Whether a determination by an adjudicator under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 is a 'decision of a court' for s 6 of the Suitors' Fund Act" "Effect of applicant's liquidation on grant of indemnity certificate"]
Ratio Decidendi
The adjudication process under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 does not constitute the exercise of the powers of a 'court' as required by s 6 of the Suitors' Fund Act 1951. The adjudicator is not appointed in a manner considered appropriate for a 'court', does not have judicial powers or procedures, there is no obligation under the Act for legal qualifications, and the process lacks elements such as public hearing and power to compel or enforce. Accordingly, an adjudicator's determination is not a 'decision of a court', and so the application for an indemnity certificate is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application for indemnity certificate dismissed
Orders
- ["The defendant's application for an indemnity certificate pursuant to s 6 of the Suitors' Fund Act 1951 is dismissed." 'No order as to costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment