The Owners – Strata Plan No 63731 v B & G Trading Pty Ltd [2020] NSWCATAP 202
By-law 32 does not confer the 'special privilege' of exemption from s 108 statutory requirements, and to the extent it purports to do so, it is inconsistent with the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW) and has no force or effect. The Act permits only specified carve-outs for cosmetic and minor renovations; broader exemptions by common property rights by-laws are not intended.
- Parties
- Appellant: The Owners – Strata Plan No 63731; First Respondent: B & G Trading Pty Ltd; Second Respondent: The Bunker 2017 Pty Ltd; Third Respondent: SRSJ Management Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 September 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Determination of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Strata Title, By Laws, Statutory Interpretation, Common Property Rights, Special Privileges, Inconsistency Between by Laws and Statute
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Owners – Strata Plan No 63731
Appellant
B & G Trading Pty Ltd
First Respondent
The Bunker 2017 Pty Ltd
Second Respondent
SRSJ Management Pty Ltd
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Determination of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether by-law 32 was a common property rights by-law within s 142(b) of Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW)
- 2 Whether 'special privileges' in s 142(2) includes exemption from compliance with obligations imposed by s 108
- 3 Whether by-law 32 was inconsistent with s 108 and thus of no force or effect
Ratio Decidendi
By-law 32 does not confer the 'special privilege' of exemption from s 108 statutory requirements, and to the extent it purports to do so, it is inconsistent with the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW) and has no force or effect. The Act permits only specified carve-outs for cosmetic and minor renovations; broader exemptions by common property rights by-laws are not intended.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The orders made by the Tribunal are set aside.
- Respondents are to restore the common property the subject of the work referred to at [10] of the Tribunal's reasons at first instance to the condition it was in prior to the commencement of those works on or before 1 February 2021.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment