Premium Building Management Pty Ltd v The Owners - Strata Plan No 69204 [2019] NSWDC 312
A binding building management agreement, complete in its essential terms, was entered into on 23 May 2017. The agreement was not rendered invalid by lack of execution under s 67 of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW); statutory language was directory, not prohibitory. PBM may alternatively rely on August 2017 as contract formation if primary case failed. Assessment of loss of profit damages did not require further allocation of overheads in this instance.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Premium Building Management Pty Ltd; Second Plaintiff: Premium Strata Pty Ltd; Defendant: The Owners – Strata Plan No 69204
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 July 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Principal Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff (PBM) for loss of profit
- Legal Topics
- Building Management Agreements, Contract Formation, Statutory Illegality, Estoppel, Damages for Loss of Profit, Pleading Requirements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Premium Building Management Pty Ltd
First Plaintiff
Premium Strata Pty Ltd
Second Plaintiff
The Owners – Strata Plan No 69204
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Principal Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether and when a binding building management agreement came into existence and its terms
- 2 Whether agreement invalid for non-compliance with s 67 of Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW)
- 3 Whether estoppel precluded Owners Corporation from denying a binding agreement
Ratio Decidendi
A binding building management agreement, complete in its essential terms, was entered into on 23 May 2017. The agreement was not rendered invalid by lack of execution under s 67 of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW); statutory language was directory, not prohibitory. PBM may alternatively rely on August 2017 as contract formation if primary case failed. Assessment of loss of profit damages did not require further allocation of overheads in this instance.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff (PBM) for loss of profit
Orders
- Plaintiff to serve on defendant short minutes of orders within 7 days reflecting reasons for judgment, quantum and costs.
- Defendant to respond as to consent or objection within further 3 days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment