Owners Strata Plan 70335 v Walsh Bay Finance [2013] NSWSC 1623
Exceptional circumstances exist, justifying an order for disclosure before evidence. These arise mainly because the plaintiff was not a party to nor in existence at the time of the contract, cannot otherwise know relevant facts necessary for its pleading, and must respond to possible strike-out applications.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: The Owners Strata Plan No. 70335; First Defendant: Wash Bay Finance Pty Ltd; Second Defendant: Bellingham Marine Australia Pty Ltd; Third Defendant: International Marina Consultants Pty Ltd; Fourth Defendant: Steve Watson and Partners Pty Ltd; Fifth Defendant: Roads and Maritime Services
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 October 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Procedural and Other Rulings / Application for Disclosure Before Evidence; Leave to Amend Statement
- Outcome
- Order for disclosure before evidence made. Question of amendments stood over. Costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure, Application for Disclosure, Leave to Amend List Statement, Exceptional Circumstances, Civil Procedure Act 2005 (nsw)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Owners Strata Plan No. 70335
Plaintiff
Wash Bay Finance Pty Ltd
First Defendant
Bellingham Marine Australia Pty Ltd
Second Defendant
International Marina Consultants Pty Ltd
Third Defendant
Steve Watson and Partners Pty Ltd
Fourth Defendant
Roads and Maritime Services
Fifth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Procedural and Other Rulings / Application for Disclosure Before Evidence; Leave to Amend Statement
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether exceptional circumstances exist sufficient to justify disclosure before evidence under Practice Note Eq 11
- 2 Appropriateness of determining application for disclosure before application to amend statements under s 56 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW)
Ratio Decidendi
Exceptional circumstances exist, justifying an order for disclosure before evidence. These arise mainly because the plaintiff was not a party to nor in existence at the time of the contract, cannot otherwise know relevant facts necessary for its pleading, and must respond to possible strike-out applications.
Court Disposition
Order for disclosure before evidence made. Question of amendments stood over. Costs reserved.
Orders
- Order in terms of prayer 2 of the notice of motion filed on 14 October 2013 for disclosure before evidence.
- Documents to be disclosed by Monday 4 November 2013.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment