The Owners – Strata Plan No 84674 v Pafburn Pty Ltd [2023] NSWSC 116
The statutory duty imposed by s 37 of the Design and Building Practitioners Act 2020 (NSW) is non-delegable by operation of statute (s 39), but this does not bring the claim within s 5Q of the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), which deals with non-delegable duties arising in tort. Therefore, the proportionate liability provisions of the Civil Liability Act do apply to such statutory duty claims, and the defendants are not precluded from raising a proportionate liability defence. The pleaded defence was not so manifestly groundless as to merit summary dismissal.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 February 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Building Defects Claim / Application for Summary Dismissal or Strike Out of Proportionate Liability Defence
- Outcome
- Application for strike out / summary dismissal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['proportionate Liability' 'non Delegable Duty' 'statutory Duty of Care' 'summary Dismissal' 'apportionable Claims']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Building Defects Claim / Application for Summary Dismissal or Strike Out of Proportionate Liability Defence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proportionate liability provisions of the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) apply to a claim for breach of statutory duty under s 37 of the Design and Building Practitioners Act 2020 (NSW)' 'Whether ss 5Q and 39(a) of the Civil Liability Act preclude reliance on proportionate liability because the statutory duty is non-delegable' 'Whether the paragraphs of the defence disclosed a reasonable defence']
Ratio Decidendi
The statutory duty imposed by s 37 of the Design and Building Practitioners Act 2020 (NSW) is non-delegable by operation of statute (s 39), but this does not bring the claim within s 5Q of the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), which deals with non-delegable duties arising in tort. Therefore, the proportionate liability provisions of the Civil Liability Act do apply to such statutory duty claims, and the defendants are not precluded from raising a proportionate liability defence. The pleaded defence was not so manifestly groundless as to merit summary dismissal.
Court Disposition
Application for strike out / summary dismissal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Application to summarily dismiss or strike out the proportionate liability defence is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment