The Owners – Strata Plan No 89074 v Ceerose Pty Ltd [2024] NSWSC 1494
The referee's reports were thorough and analytical; no error of law, principle, or manifest unreasonableness was found in determining the owner's refusal to permit access was reasonable and costs claimed were recoverable. The interests of justice are served by adoption of the referee's reports (subject to clerical corrections), and damages should be assessed according to standards at the contract date with Scott Schedule and pleaded particulars forming the basis for loss.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: The Owners – Strata Plan No 89074; First Defendant: Ceerose Pty Ltd; Second Defendant: Prisand Investments Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Building Defects Claim / Post Referee Report, Orders for Adoption and Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for plaintiff; adoption (with variation) of referee reports.
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Warranties, Mitigation of Loss, Scott Schedules, Referee Procedure, Assessment of Damages, Adoption of Referee Reports
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Owners – Strata Plan No 89074
Plaintiff
Ceerose Pty Ltd
First Defendant
Prisand Investments Pty Ltd
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Building Defects Claim / Post Referee Report, Orders for Adoption and Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff failed to mitigate its loss by refusing the builder access to rectify defects
- 2 Whether rectification costs claimed not in the Scott Schedule are recoverable
- 3 Whether the correct Australian Standard was applied for bathroom defects
Ratio Decidendi
The referee's reports were thorough and analytical; no error of law, principle, or manifest unreasonableness was found in determining the owner's refusal to permit access was reasonable and costs claimed were recoverable. The interests of justice are served by adoption of the referee's reports (subject to clerical corrections), and damages should be assessed according to standards at the contract date with Scott Schedule and pleaded particulars forming the basis for loss.
Court Disposition
Judgment for plaintiff; adoption (with variation) of referee reports.
Orders
- Item 88 varied from $44,895 to $38,046
- Item F1 varied from $17,295 to $14,245
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment