Kilpatrick v The Queen [2000] FCA 632
The sentences imposed were manifestly excessive given the low objective seriousness of the offences, appellant's lack of prior convictions, significant personal consequences, and the fact that after seven months custody, further imprisonment would be excessive. Appeal allowed, sentences set aside, and substituted sentence imposed to expire on the day of order, permitting immediate release.
- Parties
- Applicant/appellant: Martin Joseph Kilpatrick; Respondent: The Queen
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 May 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Sexual Offences Against Children, Appeal Out of Time, Manifestly Excessive Sentence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Martin Joseph Kilpatrick
Applicant/appellant
The Queen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether sentences imposed for two counts of indecency with children were manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether custodial sentence is mandatory for offences at lower end of scale
- 3 Application of statutory sentencing principles
Ratio Decidendi
The sentences imposed were manifestly excessive given the low objective seriousness of the offences, appellant's lack of prior convictions, significant personal consequences, and the fact that after seven months custody, further imprisonment would be excessive. Appeal allowed, sentences set aside, and substituted sentence imposed to expire on the day of order, permitting immediate release.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Leave to appeal out of time granted
- Sentences imposed on 9 July 1999 set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment