The Queen v Guode [2020] HCA 8
The Court of Appeal erred by treating the Crown's acceptance of the respondent's plea to infanticide as relevant to sentencing for murder and attempted murder, thereby allowing the infanticide sentencing regime to improperly affect those sentences, contrary to Parliament's intent. Sentencing for murder and attempted murder must not be informed by the unique infanticide regime but must rely solely on the relevant statutory maximums and established principles concerning mental impairment.
- Parties
- Appellant: The Queen; Respondent: Akon Guode
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 March 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / High Court Determination on Appeal From Supreme Court of Victoria Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed (Kiefel CJ, Gageler, Nettle JJ) / Appeal dismissed (Gordon, Edelman JJ)
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Irrelevant Consideration, Manifestly Excessive Sentence, Mental Impairment, Infanticide, Murder, Attempted Murder, Mitigating Factors
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Queen
Appellant
Akon Guode
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / High Court Determination on Appeal From Supreme Court of Victoria Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the acceptance of a plea of guilty to infanticide was a relevant consideration in sentencing for murder and attempted murder
- 2 Whether the Court of Appeal erred by evaluating sentences for murder and attempted murder in light of the maximum penalty for infanticide
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal erred by treating the Crown's acceptance of the respondent's plea to infanticide as relevant to sentencing for murder and attempted murder, thereby allowing the infanticide sentencing regime to improperly affect those sentences, contrary to Parliament's intent. Sentencing for murder and attempted murder must not be informed by the unique infanticide regime but must rely solely on the relevant statutory maximums and established principles concerning mental impairment.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed (Kiefel CJ, Gageler, Nettle JJ) / Appeal dismissed (Gordon, Edelman JJ)
Orders
- Appeal allowed.
- Set aside the orders made by the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Victoria on 16 August 2018.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment