R v Kelly; Ex parte Waterside Workers' Federation of Australia [1952] HCA 25
The Waterside Workers' Award, as varied, continued in force after the Stevedoring Industry Act 1947 by virtue of the transitional provisions and continuing statutory power, and did not terminate upon the new Act coming into force. The orders of 8 May 1952 were within power; no ground for prohibition was established.
- Parties
- Applicant: The Queen; Respondent: Kelly and Others; Prosecutor: Waterside Workers' Federation of Australia; Respondent: Commonwealth Steamship Owners' Association; Respondent: Selwyn Victor Jones (Chairman of the Oversea Shipping Representatives' Association); Intervener: Attorney-General of the Commonwealth (Intervening)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Order Nisi for Prohibition / Judgment After Argument on Validity of Prohibition Orders
- Outcome
- Order nisi for prohibition discharged with costs
- Legal Topics
- Industrial Arbitration, Statutory Interpretation, Validity of Award, Repeal of Statutory Powers, Prohibition Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Queen
Applicant
Kelly and Others
Respondent
Waterside Workers' Federation of Australia
Prosecutor
Commonwealth Steamship Owners' Association
Respondent
Selwyn Victor Jones (Chairman of the Oversea Shipping Representatives' Association)
Respondent
Attorney-General of the Commonwealth (Intervening)
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Order Nisi for Prohibition / Judgment After Argument on Validity of Prohibition Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Waterside Workers' Award ceased to exist or to be enforceable on the commencement of the Stevedoring Industry Act 1947
- 2 Whether the orders of 8 May 1952 by the Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration were outside its power
- 3 Effect of repeal or modification of statutory powers upon continuing awards and obligations
Ratio Decidendi
The Waterside Workers' Award, as varied, continued in force after the Stevedoring Industry Act 1947 by virtue of the transitional provisions and continuing statutory power, and did not terminate upon the new Act coming into force. The orders of 8 May 1952 were within power; no ground for prohibition was established.
Court Disposition
Order nisi for prohibition discharged with costs
Orders
- Order nisi for prohibition discharged with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment