The Queen v Hillier [2007] HCA 13
The majority of the Court of Appeal erred by considering circumstantial evidence in isolation and failing to apply the proper appellate standard; upon the whole of the evidence, it was open for the jury to be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt. The matter should be remitted for rehearing by the Court of Appeal.
- Parties
- Applicant: The Queen; Respondent: Steven Wayne Hillier
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 March 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Special Leave to Appeal and Appeal From Court of Appeal Decision
- Outcome
- Special leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed; orders of the Court of Appeal set aside; matter remitted to the Court of Appeal for rehearing.
- Legal Topics
- Criminal Appeals, Circumstantial Evidence, Unsafe or Unsatisfactory Verdict, Appellate Jurisdiction, Trial Irregularity, DNA Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Queen
Applicant
Steven Wayne Hillier
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Special Leave to Appeal and Appeal From Court of Appeal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court of Appeal erred in quashing the jury's verdict
- 2 Proper appellate standard for reviewing jury verdicts where no common form criminal appeal statute is enacted
- 3 Extent of duties and powers of the Court of Appeal under Pt 2A of the Supreme Court Act 1933 (ACT)
Ratio Decidendi
The majority of the Court of Appeal erred by considering circumstantial evidence in isolation and failing to apply the proper appellate standard; upon the whole of the evidence, it was open for the jury to be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt. The matter should be remitted for rehearing by the Court of Appeal.
Court Disposition
Special leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed; orders of the Court of Appeal set aside; matter remitted to the Court of Appeal for rehearing.
Orders
- Special leave to appeal is granted.
- The appeal is treated as instituted and heard instanter and allowed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment