The Scots College v Woollahra Municipal Council [2023] NSWLEC 1167
Because the parties reached agreement at the s 34 conciliation conference and the Commissioner was satisfied, on the evidence and the Council's jurisdictional submissions, that all relevant preconditions were met and that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, the appeal was upheld and development consent was granted subject to conditions.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 April 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Under S 8.7(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Against Refusal of a Development Application / Orders Following S 34 Conciliation Conference and Agreement Between the Parties
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions of consent at Annexure A.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'school Development' 'underground Carpark' 'tennis Courts' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreed Orders' 'heritage' 'earthworks' 'state Environmental Planning Policy']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Under S 8.7(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Against Refusal of a Development Application / Orders Following S 34 Conciliation Conference and Agreement Between the Parties
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the parties' agreed decision was a decision the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979." 'Whether development consent could be granted for Development Application No. 390/2019/1 under s 4.16 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.' 'Whether relevant preconditions to granting development consent for the proposal were satisfied, including under SEPP (Transport and Infrastructure) 2021, SEPP (Resilience and Hazards) 2021 and Woollahra Local Environmental Plan 2014.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the parties reached agreement at the s 34 conciliation conference and the Commissioner was satisfied, on the evidence and the Council's jurisdictional submissions, that all relevant preconditions were met and that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, the appeal was upheld and development consent was granted subject to conditions.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions of consent at Annexure A.
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'Development Application No. 390/2019/1 for the demolition of the tennis courts, excavation to create an underground carpark and associated facilities with new tennis courts above and new relocated entry from Cranbrook Lane, at 29-53 Victoria Road, Bellevue Hill, is determined by the grant...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment