Stanley Mervyn, Adrian Young, and Livingston West and Ors, on behalf of the Peoples of the Ngaanyatjarra Lands v The State of Western Australia and Ors [2005] FCA 831
The Court made the consent determination because the parties' written signed agreement had been filed, the Court had jurisdiction and power to make the proposed orders, the proposed determination satisfied the requirements of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), and it was appropriate to make the orders given the parties had independent and competent legal advice, the agreement was freely entered into, the agreed terms were unambiguous, and the uncontested application material sufficiently demonstrated the claimant group's connection with the Determination Area under traditional laws and customs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 June 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Native Title Determination Application / Consent Determination Under S 87 of the Native Title Act 1993 (cth)
- Outcome
- Consent determination of native title made; First Applications other than WAD 6103 of 1998 discontinued; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['consent Determination' "court's Discretion Under S 87" 'recognition of Native Title Rights and Interests' 'prescribed Body Corporate Holding Native Title on Trust' 'extinguishment and Disregarding Prior Extinguishment']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Native Title Determination Application / Consent Determination Under S 87 of the Native Title Act 1993 (cth)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the requirements of s 87 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) for making consent orders without a further hearing were satisfied.' 'Whether the proposed determination of native title was within the power of the Court.' 'Whether it was appropriate to make the agreed orders determining native title over the Determination Area.' 'What native title rights and interests, and other interests, should be recognised in relation to the Determination Area.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court made the consent determination because the parties' written signed agreement had been filed, the Court had jurisdiction and power to make the proposed orders, the proposed determination satisfied the requirements of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), and it was appropriate to make the orders given the parties had independent and competent legal advice, the agreement was freely entered into, the agreed terms were unambiguous, and the uncontested application material sufficiently demonstrated the claimant group's connection with the Determination Area under traditional laws and customs.
Court Disposition
Consent determination of native title made; First Applications other than WAD 6103 of 1998 discontinued; no order as to costs.
Orders
- ['There be a determination of native title in application WAD 6004 of 2004 in the terms of the Minute of Consent Determination of Native Title dated 29 June 2005 and attached to these orders.' 'The First Applications, other than application WAD 6103 of 1998, be discontinued.' 'Yarnangu Ngaanyatjarraku Parna...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment