The Trustees for the Stephen Unit Trust trading as Stephen Davidson v Waverley Council [2021] NSWLEC 1375
Because the amended proposal was permissible with consent in the B4 Mixed Use zone, satisfied the relevant Waverley Local Environmental Plan 2012 controls and other applicable environmental planning instruments, had addressed submissions and the Respondent's contentions through amendments and agreed conditions, and was in the public interest, the parties' agreed decision was one the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979; the appeal was therefore upheld and development consent granted subject to conditions.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 June 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Pursuant to S 8.7 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Against Refusal of Development Application DA 412/2019 / Orders Made Following S 34 Conciliation Conference and Agreement Between the Parties
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application Appeal' 'mixed Use Development' 'residential Apartment Development' 'conciliation Agreement' 'basix' 'remediation of Land' 'design Quality' 'heritage Conservation Area' 'public Interest']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Pursuant to S 8.7 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Against Refusal of Development Application DA 412/2019 / Orders Made Following S 34 Conciliation Conference and Agreement Between the Parties
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Court could make orders under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 in accordance with the parties' agreement." 'Whether the amended mixed use development was permissible with consent in the B4 Mixed Use zone under the Waverley Local Environmental Plan 2012.' 'Whether the amended proposal satisfied relevant planning controls, environmental planning instruments and jurisdictional prerequisites for the grant of consent.' 'Whether the amended proposal, with agreed conditions, was in the public interest under s 4.15 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the amended proposal was permissible with consent in the B4 Mixed Use zone, satisfied the relevant Waverley Local Environmental Plan 2012 controls and other applicable environmental planning instruments, had addressed submissions and the Respondent's contentions through amendments and agreed conditions, and was in the public interest, the parties' agreed decision was one the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979; the appeal was therefore upheld and development consent granted subject to conditions.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions.
Orders
- ["Leave is granted to the Applicant to rely upon the revised BASIX certificate (number 1050308M_03) dated 20 May 2021 and the stamped BASIX plans annexed to this agreement at Annexure 'A'." 'The appeal is upheld.' "Consent is granted to Development Application DA-412/2019, as amended, for the demolition of all...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment