Trade Practices Comm v The Vales Wine Co Pty Ltd & Ors [1996] FCA 346
The company made representations in trade or commerce that certain wines were of specific composition and vintage when, in fact, the wines supplied did not match those representations. It is not necessary to prove intent or inducement; it is sufficient that the representations were false. The directors aided,...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: TRADE PRACTICES COMMISSION; Defendant: THE VALES WINE COMPANY PTY LTD; Defendant: MICHAEL GUNTHER BARON VON BERG; Defendant: CLAUDE VIRGILIO CURTIS
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 May 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Prosecution / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Convictions recorded in part; other charges dismissed; further consideration adjourned.
- Legal Topics
- False or Misleading Conduct, Composition of Goods, Statutory Interpretation, Accomplice Evidence
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
TRADE PRACTICES COMMISSION
Prosecutor
THE VALES WINE COMPANY PTY LTD
Defendant
MICHAEL GUNTHER BARON VON BERG
Defendant
CLAUDE VIRGILIO CURTIS
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Prosecution / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether The Vales Wine Company Pty Ltd falsely represented the composition of wine supplied to customers, contravening section 53(a) of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)
- 2 Whether knowledge of falsity or inducement was required for conviction under section 53(a) of the TPA
- 3 Whether directors Michael Gunther Baron von Berg and Claude Virgilio Curtis aided, abetted, counselled or procured the company's contraventions
Ratio Decidendi
The company made representations in trade or commerce that certain wines were of specific composition and vintage when, in fact, the wines supplied did not match those representations. It is not necessary to prove intent or inducement; it is sufficient that the representations were false. The directors aided, abetted, counselled or procured the commission of the offence by knowing of and approving the sales which contravened the TPA.
Court Disposition
Convictions recorded in part; other charges dismissed; further consideration adjourned.
Orders
- Counts 1, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9 and 10 against the company dismissed.
- Convictions recorded in respect of Counts 2, 3, 6 and 11 against the company.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment