The White Ant Co Pty Ltd v Robson (No 2) [2016] NSWCA 245
The appropriate order is that the respondents pay 40 per cent of the appellant's costs of the appeal and application for leave, as the appellant only succeeded on one ground, and the complexity and history of the pleadings and offers did not warrant indemnity costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 September 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Post Judgment, Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Respondents to pay 40 per cent of the appellant's costs of the appeal and application for leave to appeal.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'appeals' 'offers of Compromise' 'indemnity Costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Post Judgment, Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What is the appropriate apportionment of costs of the appeal and application for leave to appeal?' 'Should indemnity costs be payable due to rejection of offers of compromise by the respondents?']
Ratio Decidendi
The appropriate order is that the respondents pay 40 per cent of the appellant's costs of the appeal and application for leave, as the appellant only succeeded on one ground, and the complexity and history of the pleadings and offers did not warrant indemnity costs.
Court Disposition
Respondents to pay 40 per cent of the appellant's costs of the appeal and application for leave to appeal.
Orders
- ["Respondents pay 40 per cent of the appellant's costs of the appeal and the application for leave to appeal."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment