Two Italian Boys Holdings Pty Ltd v The Winery Pty Ltd [2016] NSWSC 1163
The court held that without the defendant's defence filed, the merits of the plaintiffs' case and the proportionality of the security for costs could not properly be assessed, so no order for security should be made at this stage and the application was adjourned.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 August 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Security for Costs / Interlocutory Hearing; Decision on Adjournment and Directions
- Outcome
- Application for security for costs adjourned; directions for defendant to file and serve defence; costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- ['security for Costs' 'corporate Impecuniosity']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Security for Costs / Interlocutory Hearing; Decision on Adjournment and Directions
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether an order for security for costs should be made where plaintiffs are arguably impecunious' "Whether plaintiffs' financial position was caused by the defendant" "Strength of plaintiffs' case prior to defendant filing a defence" 'Adequacy and proportionality of security offered by plaintiffs']
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that without the defendant's defence filed, the merits of the plaintiffs' case and the proportionality of the security for costs could not properly be assessed, so no order for security should be made at this stage and the application was adjourned.
Court Disposition
Application for security for costs adjourned; directions for defendant to file and serve defence; costs reserved.
Orders
- ['Parties to bring in short minutes of order giving effect to these reasons.' 'Defendant to file and serve verified defence before the adjourned hearing.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment