Difford v Davidson [2018] NSWLEC 1612
Mrs Difford failed to make reasonable effort to reach agreement with Mr Davidson as required by s 10(1)(a) of the Trees Act, and it could not be established with certainty that roots of any particular tree caused the initial damage to the sewer pipe; consequently, no orders can be made for removal, root barriers, or compensation.
- Parties
- Applicant: Thelma Difford; Respondent: Jason Davidson
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 November 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Class 2 Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 (nsw) / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Tree Disputes Between Neighbours, Nuisance, Abatement Rights, Compensation, Root Damage to Sewer Pipes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Thelma Difford
Applicant
Jason Davidson
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Class 2 Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 (nsw) / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether roots from Mr Davidson's trees caused damage to Mrs Difford's sewer pipe
- 2 Whether orders for removal or root barrier installation should be made
- 3 Whether Mrs Difford made reasonable effort to reach agreement with Mr Davidson as required by s 10(1)(a) of the Trees Act
Ratio Decidendi
Mrs Difford failed to make reasonable effort to reach agreement with Mr Davidson as required by s 10(1)(a) of the Trees Act, and it could not be established with certainty that roots of any particular tree caused the initial damage to the sewer pipe; consequently, no orders can be made for removal, root barriers, or compensation.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- The application is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment