Alexakis v Secretary, Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations [2009] FCAFC 124
There was no evidence of actual or apprehended bias by the primary judge. The appellant failed to raise any question of law to enliven the appellate jurisdiction under s 44 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth). The appellant had an adequate opportunity to present his case. The appeal had no merit and was dismissed with costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 September 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Full Court Appeal From Single Judge of the Federal Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal' 'jurisdiction' 'question of Law' 'bias' 'procedural Fairness' 'interlocutory Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Full Court Appeal From Single Judge of the Federal Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the primary judge's decision was final or interlocutory" 'Whether the appeal raised a question of law under s 44 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth)' 'Whether there was actual or apprehended bias by the primary judge' 'Whether the appellant had sufficient opportunity to present his case']
Ratio Decidendi
There was no evidence of actual or apprehended bias by the primary judge. The appellant failed to raise any question of law to enliven the appellate jurisdiction under s 44 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth). The appellant had an adequate opportunity to present his case. The appeal had no merit and was dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed.' 'The Appellant pay the costs of the Respondents.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment