Tran v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (No 2) [2006] FCA 199
The applicant's solicitor pursued an utterly devoid of merit constitutional point, leading to unnecessary costs. The solicitor was aware the claim was unarguable, so pursuant to O 62 r 9(1)(c), he is ordered to repay to the applicant (by direct payment to respondents) $1000 towards the costs incurred.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 March 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Application / Post Judgment Costs Order
- Outcome
- Applicant's solicitor ordered to pay $1000 towards costs thrown away by pursuing hopeless constitutional point.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'wasted Costs' 'liability of Solicitor' 'federal Court Rules' 'constitutional Law']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Costs Application / Post Judgment Costs Order
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the applicant's solicitor should be ordered to repay costs to the applicant under O 62 r 9(1)(c) of the Federal Court Rules due to pursuing an unarguable constitutional challenge"]
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant's solicitor pursued an utterly devoid of merit constitutional point, leading to unnecessary costs. The solicitor was aware the claim was unarguable, so pursuant to O 62 r 9(1)(c), he is ordered to repay to the applicant (by direct payment to respondents) $1000 towards the costs incurred.
Court Disposition
Applicant's solicitor ordered to pay $1000 towards costs thrown away by pursuing hopeless constitutional point.
Orders
- ["Applicant's solicitor to repay to the applicant the sum of $1000 towards costs ordered on 10 February 2006 to be paid to respondents." "Applicant's solicitor to pay $1000 directly to respondents on or before 9 May 2006." 'The sum, when paid, to be credited to the applicant by respondents and deducted from costs...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment