Thi Lan NGUYEN v R [2009] NSWCCA 181

Thi Lan NGUYEN v R [2009] NSWCCA 181

The original sentence imposed was manifestly excessive when compared to comparable cases and judicial statistics; hardship arising from applicant's circumstances as a foreign national and available evidence was not properly weighed; applicant re-sentenced to a term within statistical and precedential bounds.

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
14 July 2009
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence; Appeal
Outcome
Appeal allowed; sentence quashed; applicant re-sentenced
Legal Topics
['appeal Against Sentence' 'cultivation of Cannabis' 'sentencing Principles' 'manifestly Excessive Sentence' 'hardship for Foreign Nationals' 'prospects of Rehabilitation' 'aggravating Features in Sentencing']
['criminal Law'] ['appeal Against Sentence' 'cultivation of Cannabis' 'sentencing Principles' 'manifestly Excessive Sentence' 'hardship for Foreign Nationals' 'prospects of Rehabilitation' 'aggravating Features in Sentencing']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence; Appeal

  1. 1 ['Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive' 'Whether the sentencing judge wrongly treated cultivation by enhanced indoor means as an aggravating feature' "Whether the sentencing judge failed to properly consider hardship due to applicant's status as a foreign national" 'Whether sentencing judge gave due weight to prospects of rehabilitation and unlikelihood of re-offending']

Ratio Decidendi

The original sentence imposed was manifestly excessive when compared to comparable cases and judicial statistics; hardship arising from applicant's circumstances as a foreign national and available evidence was not properly weighed; applicant re-sentenced to a term within statistical and precedential bounds.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; sentence quashed; applicant re-sentenced

Orders

  • ['Application for leave to appeal allowed.' 'Appeal allowed.' 'Sentence imposed in the District Court on 2 December 2008 quashed.' 'Applicant sentenced to imprisonment with a non-parole period of 22 months to commence on 11 December 2007 and expire on 10 October 2009, and a balance of term of 14 months to expire on...