Vo v Tran (No 2) [2016] NSWSC 1198
The earlier $125,000 buffer for future economic loss did not include consideration of future superannuation, but because a buffer award is not calculated by applying a percentage to weekly loss, only a modest additional sum of $5,000 was allowed for future lost superannuation contributions. The future physiotherapy claim was refused because the evidence was scant and no specific head of claim had been particularised, making an award unfair and not quantifiable. The plaintiff, as successful party, was awarded costs on the ordinary basis.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 August 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Common Law Damages Proceedings / Further Submissions on Damages and Final Orders After Reasons for Judgment Delivered on 29 July 2016
- Outcome
- Verdict and judgment entered for the plaintiff against the defendants in the amount of $512,764.94, with costs on the ordinary basis.
- Legal Topics
- ['future Economic Loss' 'future Lost Superannuation Contributions' 'future Physiotherapy' 'non Economic Loss' 'costs Follow the Event']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Common Law Damages Proceedings / Further Submissions on Damages and Final Orders After Reasons for Judgment Delivered on 29 July 2016
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether an allowance should be made for future lost superannuation contributions in addition to the buffer for future economic loss.' 'Whether the plaintiff should receive an amount for future physiotherapy.' 'What final judgment sum and costs orders should be made.']
Ratio Decidendi
The earlier $125,000 buffer for future economic loss did not include consideration of future superannuation, but because a buffer award is not calculated by applying a percentage to weekly loss, only a modest additional sum of $5,000 was allowed for future lost superannuation contributions. The future physiotherapy claim was refused because the evidence was scant and no specific head of claim had been particularised, making an award unfair and not quantifiable. The plaintiff, as successful party, was awarded costs on the ordinary basis.
Court Disposition
Verdict and judgment entered for the plaintiff against the defendants in the amount of $512,764.94, with costs on the ordinary basis.
Orders
- ['I enter verdict and judgment in favour of the plaintiff in the amount of $512,764.94.' "I order that the defendants pay the plaintiff's costs of the proceedings on the ordinary basis, including the hearing on 18 August 2016."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment