Inspector Nathan Hamilton v Thiess Pty Ltd and Ors [2009] NSWIRComm 41
Having reviewed the submissions and competing considerations of efficiency, fairness, and public interest, the Court determined that all proceedings should be heard together commencing 26 October 2009, with adjustments to accommodate counsel and liberty for John Holland Pty Ltd to apply for further orders if necessary.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 March 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Prosecution / Interlocutory Application Regarding Joint Hearing
- Outcome
- Application for joint hearing granted.
- Legal Topics
- ['joint Hearing' 'application for Joint Trial' 'procedural Orders' 'court Jurisdiction']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Prosecution / Interlocutory Application Regarding Joint Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether proceedings under s 8(1) and s 8(2) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 should be heard jointly' 'Whether the charges against each defendant can appropriately be tried together' "Timing and management of the hearing given pending 'mines issue' and 'Comcare issue'"]
Ratio Decidendi
Having reviewed the submissions and competing considerations of efficiency, fairness, and public interest, the Court determined that all proceedings should be heard together commencing 26 October 2009, with adjustments to accommodate counsel and liberty for John Holland Pty Ltd to apply for further orders if necessary.
Court Disposition
Application for joint hearing granted.
Orders
- ['Proceedings in IRC 7/1993 and IRC 7/1994 (Inspector Nathan Hamilton v Parsons Brinckerhoff Australia Pty Ltd) to commence on 26 October 2009 until 11 December 2009.' 'Proceedings in IRC 7/1987 to IRC 7/1992 inclusive set down to commence on 26 October 2009 until 11 December 2009.' 'John Holland Pty Ltd granted...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment