Thiess Pty Ltd & Anor v Zurich Specialties London Ltd & Anor [2009] NSWCA 47
The obligation for the insured to take reasonable precautions under clause 18 of the Construction Risks Insurance Policy is a condition precedent for indemnity, not a contractual promise to carry out construction work. The insurance policy's commercial purpose is to provide indemnity for loss or damage, not to oblige the insured to perform construction work for the insurers. Therefore, the policy does not contain a 'construction contract' within the meaning of the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999.
- Parties
- Appellant: Thiess Pty Ltd; Appellant: John Holland Pty Ltd; Respondent: Zurich Specialties London Ltd; Respondent: Swiss re International SE
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 March 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Construction Risks Insurance Policy Interpretation, Construction Contract Definition Under Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999, Conditions Precedent in Insurance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Thiess Pty Ltd
Appellant
John Holland Pty Ltd
Appellant
Zurich Specialties London Ltd
Respondent
Swiss re International SE
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Construction Risks Insurance Policy constituted a 'construction contract' under s 4 of the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999
- 2 Whether the obligation to take reasonable precautions under the policy was simply a condition precedent to insurer's liability or an enforceable promise to take those precautions
Ratio Decidendi
The obligation for the insured to take reasonable precautions under clause 18 of the Construction Risks Insurance Policy is a condition precedent for indemnity, not a contractual promise to carry out construction work. The insurance policy's commercial purpose is to provide indemnity for loss or damage, not to oblige the insured to perform construction work for the insurers. Therefore, the policy does not contain a 'construction contract' within the meaning of the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment