Thiu Dieu Vu v Regina [2018] NSWCCA 122

Thiu Dieu Vu v Regina [2018] NSWCCA 122

No error of principle by the sentencing judge was demonstrated. The same indicative sentences for counts 1 and 3 were justified by the Form 1 offences attached and the circumstances of the offending. The disparity in sentences between the applicant and co-offender Mr Vu was justified by differences in roles and criminality. The aggregate sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
22 June 2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
Leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
['sentencing' 'drug Offences' 'aggregate Sentences' 'parity Principle' 'manifest Excess']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence

  1. 1 ['Whether the sentencing judge erred in the approach to indicative sentences leading to an excessive aggregate sentence' 'Whether there was a justifiable sense of grievance comparing the sentence imposed on the applicant to that of a co-offender' 'Whether the sentence imposed on the applicant was manifestly excessive']

Ratio Decidendi

No error of principle by the sentencing judge was demonstrated. The same indicative sentences for counts 1 and 3 were justified by the Form 1 offences attached and the circumstances of the offending. The disparity in sentences between the applicant and co-offender Mr Vu was justified by differences in roles and criminality. The aggregate sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • ['Leave to appeal against sentence granted' 'Appeal dismissed']