Stanley v Mechler [2004] NSWSC 196

Stanley v Mechler [2004] NSWSC 196

Although the Calderbank principles were not excluded merely because the matter was in the Probate List, the terms of the 23 January 2003 letter and the unresolved Family Provision Act proceedings made the plaintiff's requested order inappropriate. The proper order was that the defendant's costs on a party and party basis be paid out of the deceased's estate up until 23 January 2003, but not beyond that date.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
24 March 2004
Procedural Posture
Probate Proceedings / Costs Determination on Notice of Motion to Vary Earlier Costs Orders
Outcome
The defendant's costs on a party and party basis are to be paid out of the deceased's estate up until 23 January 2003, but not beyond that date.
Legal Topics
['calderbank Principles' 'party and Party Costs' 'costs Out of Estate' 'family Provision Proceedings' 'informal Will Probate Under S 18 A']
['probate' 'succession' 'costs'] ['calderbank Principles' 'party and Party Costs' 'costs Out of Estate' 'family Provision Proceedings' 'informal Will Probate Under S 18 A']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Probate Proceedings / Costs Determination on Notice of Motion to Vary Earlier Costs Orders

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Calderbank principles may apply in litigation in the Probate List.' "Whether the defendant should pay the plaintiff's costs on and from 23 January 2003 by reason of the plaintiff's settlement proposal." "Whether the defendant's costs should be paid out of the estate beyond 23 January 2003."]

Ratio Decidendi

Although the Calderbank principles were not excluded merely because the matter was in the Probate List, the terms of the 23 January 2003 letter and the unresolved Family Provision Act proceedings made the plaintiff's requested order inappropriate. The proper order was that the defendant's costs on a party and party basis be paid out of the deceased's estate up until 23 January 2003, but not beyond that date.

Court Disposition

The defendant's costs on a party and party basis are to be paid out of the deceased's estate up until 23 January 2003, but not beyond that date.

Orders

  • ['The costs of the defendant, on a party and party basis, be paid out of the Estate of the deceased up until 23 January 2003, but not beyond that date.']