Baxter v The Hills Shire Council [2022] NSWLEC 1119
The appeal is upheld and development consent is granted because the jurisdictional prerequisites are satisfied, the amended application complies with relevant planning instruments, environmental mitigation and management measures are adopted, and the parties reached agreement in conciliation, which the Court must adopt under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 March 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Development Application Appeal / Disposal After Conciliation Conference
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld, development consent granted
- Legal Topics
- ['development Consent' 'concept Proposal' 'biodiversity Assessment' 'site Remediation' 'stormwater Management']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Development Application Appeal / Disposal After Conciliation Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the jurisdictional prerequisites for granting development consent are satisfied' 'Whether the proposed development complies with relevant planning instruments' 'Whether mitigation measures for biodiversity and stormwater are sufficient']
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is upheld and development consent is granted because the jurisdictional prerequisites are satisfied, the amended application complies with relevant planning instruments, environmental mitigation and management measures are adopted, and the parties reached agreement in conciliation, which the Court must adopt under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld, development consent granted
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' "Development consent is granted to Development Application 228/2020/JP for a mixed-use development comprising five blocks, car parking, landscaping, conservation zones, stormwater works, and site preparation, subject to conditions contained in Annexure 'A'."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment