Lynch v Medicare Participation Review Committee [1995] FCA 810
The Committee had power under s.124J(5)(a) and (c) of the Health Insurance Act 1973 to permit counsel for the Minister to make legal submissions at the hearing, since these provisions confer broad procedural discretion and power to inform itself, including via submissions from non-parties.
- Parties
- Applicant: Thomas Brendan Lynch; First Respondent: The Medicare Participation Review Committee; Second Respondent: D I Cassidy QC; Third Respondent: E Raik; Fourth Respondent: J H Maynard; Fifth Respondent: Minister for Health, Housing & Community Services
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 October 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Application / Judgment at First Instance
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review of Administrative Decision, Committee Procedure, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Thomas Brendan Lynch
Applicant
The Medicare Participation Review Committee
First Respondent
D I Cassidy QC
Second Respondent
E Raik
Third Respondent
J H Maynard
Fourth Respondent
Minister for Health, Housing & Community Services
Fifth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Judgment at First Instance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a Medical Participation Review Committee has power to permit the Minister's counsel to make legal submissions at a hearing
- 2 Scope of Committee's procedural powers under s.124J and s.124N of the Health Insurance Act 1973
Ratio Decidendi
The Committee had power under s.124J(5)(a) and (c) of the Health Insurance Act 1973 to permit counsel for the Minister to make legal submissions at the hearing, since these provisions confer broad procedural discretion and power to inform itself, including via submissions from non-parties.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs
Orders
- The application be dismissed.
- The applicant pay the respondents' costs of the proceeding.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment