Mulhearn v Merit Homes Pty Ltd [2015] NSWCATCD 139
The Tribunal found that there was no contravention of the Surveillance Devices Act or Workplace Surveillance Act, and that, even if the evidence was arguably improperly obtained, the probative value of the evidence and the benefit to the Tribunal outweigh any reasons for exclusion; accordingly, the photographs and video images are admissible.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 November 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Procedural and Other Rulings / Ruling on Admissibility of Evidence Pending Substantive Hearing Continuation
- Outcome
- Application to tender photographs and video images allowed
- Legal Topics
- ['admissibility of Evidence' 'improperly Obtained Evidence' 'surveillance Devices' 'building Contracts']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Procedural and Other Rulings / Ruling on Admissibility of Evidence Pending Substantive Hearing Continuation
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether photographs and video obtained by time lapse surveillance camera are admissible' 'Whether evidence was obtained improperly or illegally under relevant statutes' 'Whether the desirability of admitting evidence outweighs the undesirability']
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that there was no contravention of the Surveillance Devices Act or Workplace Surveillance Act, and that, even if the evidence was arguably improperly obtained, the probative value of the evidence and the benefit to the Tribunal outweigh any reasons for exclusion; accordingly, the photographs and video images are admissible.
Court Disposition
Application to tender photographs and video images allowed
Orders
- ['The Tribunal allows the tender of the relevant photographs and video images obtained from the time lapse surveillance camera located on the land adjoining the site of the building works.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment