Dempsey, Thomas Christopher v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1998] FCA 139
The Tribunal incorrectly applied the law by failing to consider whether departure of the applicant on 15 October 1990 would cause irreparable prejudice, including future effects, as required by cl 812.723(6), and by not taking into account events occurring after 15 October 1990.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 February 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application allowed; Tribunal decision set aside; matter remitted to Tribunal; costs ordered against respondent.
- Legal Topics
- ['visa Decision Review' 'compassionate Grounds' 'irreparable Prejudice' 'extreme Hardship']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Interpretation of 'extreme hardship' and 'irreparable prejudice' under cl 812.723(6) of the 1993 Migration Regulations" 'Whether events after 15 October 1990 should be considered in assessing irreparable prejudice' 'Failure to observe procedural fairness in calling witnesses']
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal incorrectly applied the law by failing to consider whether departure of the applicant on 15 October 1990 would cause irreparable prejudice, including future effects, as required by cl 812.723(6), and by not taking into account events occurring after 15 October 1990.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; Tribunal decision set aside; matter remitted to Tribunal; costs ordered against respondent.
Orders
- ['The decision of the Immigration Review Tribunal of 30 June 1997 is set aside.' 'The matter is referred to the Tribunal to be considered according to law.' "The respondent pay the applicant's costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment