Moss, T.E. v. Brown, B.R. & Anor [1983] FCA 40
The decision of a committing magistrate that a prima facie case exists is a decision of an administrative character within the meaning of the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977. For offences against Commonwealth law, the magistrate's authority derives from the Judiciary Act 1903, so decisions made in that context are made under an enactment of the Commonwealth. The court is competent to hear the review application.
- Parties
- Applicant: Thomas Ervin Moss; First Respondent: Bruce Raymond Brown; Second Respondent: Peter Lamb
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 March 1983
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Interlocutory Motion Regarding Competency of the Court
- Outcome
- Objection to competency of the court dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Committal Proceedings, Administrative Character of Decisions, Jurisdiction of Federal Courts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Thomas Ervin Moss
Applicant
Bruce Raymond Brown
First Respondent
Peter Lamb
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Interlocutory Motion Regarding Competency of the Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the decision of a committing magistrate that a prima facie case exists under the Crimes Act (Commonwealth) is reviewable under the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977
- 2 Whether the decision is of an administrative character
- 3 Whether the decision was made under an enactment of the Commonwealth
Ratio Decidendi
The decision of a committing magistrate that a prima facie case exists is a decision of an administrative character within the meaning of the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977. For offences against Commonwealth law, the magistrate's authority derives from the Judiciary Act 1903, so decisions made in that context are made under an enactment of the Commonwealth. The court is competent to hear the review application.
Court Disposition
Objection to competency of the court dismissed
Orders
- The motion objecting to the competency of this court is dismissed.
- The second respondent is to pay the applicant's costs of the motion.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment