Hofer v Commissioner of Victims Rights [2022] NSWCATAD 258
The Tribunal confirmed the restitution order because the applicant had been convicted of a relevant offence to which the victims support related, the order was made within time, and neither the applicant's asserted innocence nor his financial circumstances warrant setting aside or reducing the debt under applicable law.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 August 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Review / Merits Hearing and Final Decision
- Outcome
- Restitution order confirmed
- Legal Topics
- ['victims Rights and Support' 'restitution Order' 'review of Administrative Decisions' 'financial Hardship' 'effect of Criminal Convictions']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Administrative Review / Merits Hearing and Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Tribunal should confirm, vary or reverse the restitution order against the applicant under the Victims Rights and Support Act 2013 (NSW)' "Whether the applicant's asserted innocence or financial circumstances warrant setting aside or reducing the restitution order"]
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal confirmed the restitution order because the applicant had been convicted of a relevant offence to which the victims support related, the order was made within time, and neither the applicant's asserted innocence nor his financial circumstances warrant setting aside or reducing the debt under applicable law.
Court Disposition
Restitution order confirmed
Orders
- ['The decision dated 15 February 2019 is confirmed under s 67(1) of the Act' 'The Order for restitution in the sum of $5,000 is confirmed under s 67(2A) of the Act' 'The restitution sum is payable within 90 days of the date of this decision']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment