Javorsky v Rico Pty Limited (in liq) & 1 Ors [2001] NSWSC 746

Javorsky v Rico Pty Limited (in liq) & 1 Ors [2001] NSWSC 746

The inadvertent holding of the second meeting of creditors one day late and the subsequent assumption that the administration had ended and the liquidator had been validly appointed warranted remedial orders under s1322(4) and s447A. The Second Defendant's proposed condition sought to preserve only an unforeseen windfall benefit from the invalidity, not a position on which it had relied in its dealings with the company. Any detriment from raising the invalidity point was adequately addressed by ordering the Plaintiff to pay the Second Defendant's attributable costs, so the overwhelming weight of justice favoured making the remedial orders.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
27 August 2001
Procedural Posture
Corporations Application for Remedial Orders Under S1322(4) and S447 a of the Corporations Act 2001 / Ex Tempore Judgment on Application for Remedial Orders
Outcome
Remedial orders made.
Legal Topics
['invalid Appointment of Liquidator' 'remedial Orders' 'second Meeting of Creditors Held Outside Convening Period' 'substantial Injustice' 'costs']
['corporations'] ['invalid Appointment of Liquidator' 'remedial Orders' 'second Meeting of Creditors Held Outside Convening Period' 'substantial Injustice' 'costs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Corporations Application for Remedial Orders Under S1322(4) and S447 a of the Corporations Act 2001 / Ex Tempore Judgment on Application for Remedial Orders

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether remedial orders should be made under s1322(4) and s447A of the Corporations Act 2001 after the second meeting of creditors was inadvertently held one day late and the liquidator was assumed to have been validly appointed.' "Whether making the remedial orders without the Second Defendant's proposed condition about the commencement of interest would cause substantial injustice." 'Whether costs should compensate the Second Defendant for costs attributable to raising the invalid appointment point.']

Ratio Decidendi

The inadvertent holding of the second meeting of creditors one day late and the subsequent assumption that the administration had ended and the liquidator had been validly appointed warranted remedial orders under s1322(4) and s447A. The Second Defendant's proposed condition sought to preserve only an unforeseen windfall benefit from the invalidity, not a position on which it had relied in its dealings with the company. Any detriment from raising the invalidity point was adequately addressed by ordering the Plaintiff to pay the Second Defendant's attributable costs, so the overwhelming weight of justice favoured making the remedial orders.

Court Disposition

Remedial orders made.

Orders

  • ['Remedial orders made pursuant to s1322(4) and s447A of the Corporations Act 2001.' 'The Plaintiff is to pay the costs of the Second Defendant on a party and party basis.']