Callow, Thomas Joseph v Commissioner of Taxation Callow, Janette v Commission of Taxation [1997] FCA 275
Section 160M(7) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) only applies to assets owned by the taxpayer; the payment made under the agreement was not for any disposal of an asset of the applicants as contemplated by the section. There was no real or direct connection between the consideration and an asset of the applicants for the purposes of the section.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 March 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment in the Federal Court of Australia
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- ['income Tax' 'capital Gains Tax' 'statutory Interpretation' 'binding Precedent']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment in the Federal Court of Australia
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether s 160M(7) of Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) applies' "Whether an 'asset' under s 160M(7) must be an asset of the taxpayer" 'Whether a previous decision (Hepples) was binding, i.e., had majority reasoning' 'Whether subsequent legislative statements are persuasive for the interpretation of earlier sections']
Ratio Decidendi
Section 160M(7) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) only applies to assets owned by the taxpayer; the payment made under the agreement was not for any disposal of an asset of the applicants as contemplated by the section. There was no real or direct connection between the consideration and an asset of the applicants for the purposes of the section.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- ["The applicant's appeal against the respondent's objection decision of 6 April 1995 be upheld." "The applicant's objection of 27 July 1994 (Janette Callow) and 28 July 1994 (Thomas Joseph Callow) against the amended assessment issued by the respondent on 10 June 1994 in respect of the income year ending 30 June...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment