Regina v Sewell [2002] NSWCCA 7
The appellant deliberately, voluntarily, and with full knowledge entered pleas of guilty to the counts in open court. Resiling from the plea agreement did not entitle him to withdraw the pleas. The sentencing judge acted within discretion and took relevant factors into account.
- Parties
- Respondent: Regina; Appellant: Thomas Joseph Sewell
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 February 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal against conviction dismissed; application for leave to appeal against sentence dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Against Conviction, Withdrawal of Guilty Plea, Sentencing, Plea Agreement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Respondent
Thomas Joseph Sewell
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant is entitled to withdraw his guilty pleas to the seven counts on the indictment
- 2 Whether the sentencing judge erred in omitting to ask the appellant whether he adhered to his pleas
- 3 Whether the sentence imposed was within discretion
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant deliberately, voluntarily, and with full knowledge entered pleas of guilty to the counts in open court. Resiling from the plea agreement did not entitle him to withdraw the pleas. The sentencing judge acted within discretion and took relevant factors into account.
Court Disposition
Appeal against conviction dismissed; application for leave to appeal against sentence dismissed.
Orders
- Appeal against conviction dismissed
- Application for leave to appeal against sentence dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment