Wenkart v Pantzer [2004] FCA 1726
The applicant did not show sufficient reason to vacate the final hearing date. The absence of the taxation certificate was known when the matter was listed, the subsequent taxation-related steps should not have surprised the applicant, and they did not raise issues that would prejudice the January 2005 final hearing.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 December 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Vacate the Hearing Date / Directions Hearing Before Final Hearing
- Outcome
- Application to vacate the hearing date dismissed; applicant ordered to pay the costs of the application.
- Legal Topics
- ['vacation of Hearing Date' 'directions' 'taxation of Costs' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application to Vacate the Hearing Date / Directions Hearing Before Final Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the hearing listed for 17 and 18 January 2005 should be vacated because certificates of taxation had issued recently, the applicant wished to appeal from the Taxing Master's certificate, and a further taxation hearing was listed for 29 December 2004." 'Whether events concerning taxation of costs since 26 October 2004 justified disturbing the final hearing date.']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant did not show sufficient reason to vacate the final hearing date. The absence of the taxation certificate was known when the matter was listed, the subsequent taxation-related steps should not have surprised the applicant, and they did not raise issues that would prejudice the January 2005 final hearing.
Court Disposition
Application to vacate the hearing date dismissed; applicant ordered to pay the costs of the application.
Orders
- ['The application to vacate the hearing date is dismissed.' 'The applicant to pay the costs of the application made today.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment