Wilkinson v S Bennett Limited [1921] HCA 14
Section 72 of the Common Law Procedure Act 1899 (N.S.W.) permits a plaintiff to rely on an innuendo without needing to include prefatory averments; where the declaration is otherwise sufficient, it is not open to demurrer on the ground that prefatory averments do not support the innuendo.
- Parties
- Appellant: Thomas Wilkinson; Respondent: S. Bennett Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 April 1921
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / High Court Appeal From Supreme Court of New South Wales
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed. Judgment of the Supreme Court set aside. Judgment for plaintiff on demurrer.
- Legal Topics
- Libel, Pleading, Innuendo, Demurrer, Common Law Procedure Act 1899 (n.s.w.), Sec. 72
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Thomas Wilkinson
Appellant
S. Bennett Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / High Court Appeal From Supreme Court of New South Wales
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a declaration in an action of libel that contains prefatory averments is open to demurrer if the facts alleged do not support the innuendo
- 2 Proper construction of sec. 72 of the Common Law Procedure Act 1899 (N.S.W.) regarding the sufficiency of pleadings in libel actions
Ratio Decidendi
Section 72 of the Common Law Procedure Act 1899 (N.S.W.) permits a plaintiff to rely on an innuendo without needing to include prefatory averments; where the declaration is otherwise sufficient, it is not open to demurrer on the ground that prefatory averments do not support the innuendo.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed. Judgment of the Supreme Court set aside. Judgment for plaintiff on demurrer.
Orders
- Judgment entered for plaintiff on demurrer.
- Respondent to pay costs of appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment