Thompson v Smith [1976] HCA 56
A wife who joins her husband in executing a mortgage over jointly owned land solely to secure his debts does not, by that act alone, 'make available' her interest in the land to her husband under s. 111 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth). The declaration that her interest became an asset of the bankrupt husband's estate under that section was wrongly made and should be set aside.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['joint Tenancy' 'mortgage' 'part X Assignment' 'assets of Bankrupt Estate' 'spousal Property in Bankruptcy']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the interest of the appellant in land jointly owned with her husband was 'made available' to him within the meaning of s. 111 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) when she joined with him in executing a mortgage used as security solely for his debts."]
Ratio Decidendi
A wife who joins her husband in executing a mortgage over jointly owned land solely to secure his debts does not, by that act alone, 'make available' her interest in the land to her husband under s. 111 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth). The declaration that her interest became an asset of the bankrupt husband's estate under that section was wrongly made and should be set aside.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; with costs.
Orders
- ['Judgment of the Federal Court of Bankruptcy varied by deleting declaration numbered 1.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment