Thunderace Holdings Pty Ltd v Camden Council [2017] NSWLEC 1155
The parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 as to terms of a decision acceptable to them, and the Commissioner was satisfied that the decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions; accordingly, the Court was required to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that agreement.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 March 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Development Application Appeal / Conciliation Conference Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; Development Application No. 1362/2015, as amended, approved subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Between the Parties' 'consent Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Development Application Appeal / Conciliation Conference Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the proceedings should be disposed of in accordance with the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979." 'Whether Development Application No. 1362/2015, as amended, should be approved subject to conditions.']
Ratio Decidendi
The parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 as to terms of a decision acceptable to them, and the Commissioner was satisfied that the decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions; accordingly, the Court was required to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that agreement.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; Development Application No. 1362/2015, as amended, approved subject to conditions.
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'The Applicant is granted leave to amend Development Application No. 1362/2015 and to rely upon the amended plans listed in the orders.' "The Applicant is to pay the Respondent's costs pursuant to section 97B of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, as agreed or assessed."...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment