THURN v IRELAND [1997] NSWCA 319
There was no evidence to support the findings that the appellant was on a periodic journey or had voluntarily subjected himself to an abnormal risk of injury; therefore, the judge erred in law and the appeal must be allowed.
- Parties
- Appellant: Thurn; Respondent: Ireland
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 August 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Workers Compensation Appeal / Appeal From Compensation Court Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Compensable Injuries, Scope of Employment, Recess Journey, Periodic Journey, Error of Law
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Thurn
Appellant
Ireland
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Workers Compensation Appeal / Appeal From Compensation Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was evidence to support the trial judge's finding that the appellant was on a periodic journey under s10 Workers Compensation Act 1987
- 2 Whether there was evidence to support that the appellant voluntarily subjected himself to an abnormal risk of injury under s11(b) Workers Compensation Act 1987
Ratio Decidendi
There was no evidence to support the findings that the appellant was on a periodic journey or had voluntarily subjected himself to an abnormal risk of injury; therefore, the judge erred in law and the appeal must be allowed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Appeal allowed
- Respondent to pay appellant weekly compensation under s11 Workers Compensation Act, in the sum of $547.00 per week from 18 August 1994 until 17 February 1995, and thereafter at the statutory rate for himself and two dependent children and continuing, together with interest on arrears at 3% per annum
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment