Feng v Hunters Hill Council [2022] NSWLEC 1710
Because the parties reached agreement on orders granting development consent subject to conditions, and because the Court was satisfied that the identified jurisdictional prerequisites were met and that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 required the Court to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' decision.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Development Appeal Concerning Deemed Refusal of Development Application Da2021/1309 / Orders Following Conciliation Conference and Agreement Between the Parties
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'alterations and Additions to Dwelling House' 'deemed Refusal' 'conciliation Conference' 'consent Orders' 'jurisdictional Prerequisites for Development Consent']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Development Appeal Concerning Deemed Refusal of Development Application Da2021/1309 / Orders Following Conciliation Conference and Agreement Between the Parties
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the parties' agreed decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979." 'Whether the jurisdictional prerequisites for granting development consent to development application DA2021/1309 were satisfied.' 'Whether development consent should be granted for alterations and additions to an existing dwelling house at Lot B, DP 36427, 2 Windeyer Ave, Gladesville subject to conditions.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the parties reached agreement on orders granting development consent subject to conditions, and because the Court was satisfied that the identified jurisdictional prerequisites were met and that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 required the Court to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' decision.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions.
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' "Development consent is granted to development application No. DA2021/1309 for alterations and additions to an existing dwelling house at Lot B, DP 36427 No. 2 Windeyer Ave, Gladesville subject to the conditions set out in Annexure 'A'."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment