TIC Investments NSW Pty Ltd v Hornsby Shire Council [2024] NSWLEC 1443
Because the amended application resolved the contentions between the parties, the statutory preconditions for modification under s 4.56(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 were satisfied, relevant notification, submissions, SEPP, heritage and DCP matters had been considered, and the agreed decision was within power under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, the Court disposed of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' agreement and modified the development consent.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 July 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Concerning a Modification Application to Development Consent No. Da/259/2020 / Final Orders Following a Conciliation Conference and Executed S 34 Written Agreement
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent no. DA/259/2020 modified.
- Legal Topics
- ['modification Application' 'acoustic Fencing and Acoustic Testing Conditions' '70 Place Childcare Centre' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Between the Parties' 'state Environmental Planning Policies' 'heritage Conservation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Concerning a Modification Application to Development Consent No. Da/259/2020 / Final Orders Following a Conciliation Conference and Executed S 34 Written Agreement
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Court could dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' signed s 34 agreement." 'Whether the requirements of s 4.56(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 for modification of a development consent granted by the Court were met.' "Whether the amended modification application resolved the parties' contentions concerning the acoustic fence and associated conditions." 'Whether relevant planning considerations, including notification, submissions, SEPPs, heritage and development control plan matters, had been addressed.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the amended application resolved the contentions between the parties, the statutory preconditions for modification under s 4.56(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 were satisfied, relevant notification, submissions, SEPP, heritage and DCP matters had been considered, and the agreed decision was within power under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, the Court disposed of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' agreement and modified the development consent.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent no. DA/259/2020 modified.
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'Development consent no. DA/259/2020 is modified in the terms set out in Annexure A.' 'Development consent no. DA/259/2020, as modified, is Annexure B.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment